Length of a sequential table in Lua may skip indices? -


this question has answer here:

in lua seems if single numeric key missing table, length still continues counting:

> print(#{[1]=1,[2]=2,[4]=4}) 4 

but skipping 2 indices stops @ break

> print(#{[1]=1,[2]=2,[5]=5}) 2 

it's not unconvential constructor. if skipped index created after creation of table still counts past it, long break one.

> x={1,2} > print(#x) 2 > x[4]=4 > print(#x) 

is implementation error or how lua supposed work. why this? references documentation of interesting.

this how works. length of table defined if table sequence, no holes. see http://www.lua.org/manual/5.2/manual.html#3.4.6 .


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

c# - Send Image in Json : 400 Bad request -

jquery - Fancybox - apply a function to several elements -

An easy way to program an Android keyboard layout app -